Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 05:52
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What transforms the philosophical intellect?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Increase in Ariane 6 launch cadence could take several years - SpaceNews
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
A Game-Changing Telescope Is About to Drop First Pics. Here's How to Watch. - ScienceAlert
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why does my vagina always itch so badly after my periods?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Hegseth moves to rename Navy ship honoring gay rights icon Harvey Milk - The Washington Post
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What is your most intimate experience with your best friend?